CFC (controlled foreign corporation) rules are a set of legislation primarily introduced to prevent the operation of empty shell companies in low-tax jurisdictions out of countries with higher corporate taxes.
- 1 Why do countries implement CFC rules?
- 2 The different levels of CFC rules
- 3 Non-cooperating or blacklisted countries
- 4 A few exceptions to CFC rules
- 5 Case studies for residents of different EU countries
- 6 Conclusions
Why do countries implement CFC rules?
Corporate tax rates vary widely throughout the world. The industrialized nations of the West generally have high tax rates, while there are many countries with a lower or even 0%-tax rate in the world.
Without CFC rules, citizens of high-tax jurisdictions could circumvent their countries high tax rates, by operating their business in low-tax jurisdictions. Especially today where business can be controlled virtually and without requiring any fixed physical location, this has become more relevant than ever.
The different levels of CFC rules
With a rough categorization, we can differentiate between five different kinds of CFC rules. Category 5 means no CFC rules, and category four means only very general rules.
That leaves three main categories when it comes to the scope and extent of the individual CFC rules.
This is not a clear categorization, and the different CFC rules are subject to regular change. A good place to find up-to-date information on the specific rules for a country is the PWC Worldwide Tax Summary.
Most OECD-countries and industrialized countries have strict CFC rules that also target actively operating enterprises. If they are tax-liable domestically or abroad depends on the percentage of ownership and the tax rate in the country of incorporation.
Some countries do not target the active management of foreign companies in low tax jurisdictions with that much rigor. Their CFC rules only affect passive shell companies, with their passive income like capital gains, rental income or licensing fees. If they were to be paid out to an individual, income tax and capital gains tax would apply.
The main goal when operating a shell company is to pay out earning to the owners’ personal bank account. This is generally only possible if there are no CFC rules, or if they don’t apply in the specific case.
This is often the case in countries with weak CFC rules. In those countries,s they require a high percentage of ownership combined with a low-tax in the country of the foreign corporation. Sometimes the rules only apply to either individuals or companies. For example, if only companies are affected by the CFC rules, they are no longer able to use certain methods to transfer profits (from one country to another). A private citizen could still use an offshore company to safe taxes and transfer extra income to his bank account.
Following you will find a very simplified overview of the different classes of CFC rules, and the countries which use them. Specifically,y you will find the percentage of ownership and the tax rates required for them to take affect.
Countries with strict CFC rules, against active enterprises
Rules apply if:
Egypt: Domestic management, more than 70% passive income
Brasil: Crediting of foreign tax up to 34%
China: Below 12.5% corporate tax
Estonia: Below 12% corporate tax
France: 50% below the French tax rate
Germany: Domestic management, below 25% corporate tax, passive income
Greece: Domestic management, below 13% corporate tax
UK: Domestic management
Iceland: Domestic management, below 13.3% corporate tax
Israel: Domestic management, below 15% corporate tax, passive income
Italy: 50% below the Italian tax rate
Japan: Below 20% corporate tax
Korea: Below 15% corporate tax
Norway: 2/3 below Norwegian tax, more than 50% of shares
Portugal: Below 60% of Portuguese taxes
Russia: Domestic management, more than 10.000.000 Rubel income
South Africa: More than 50% of shares, Crediting of foreign taxes
Spain: Below 75% of Spanish taxes
Sweden: Below 12.1% corporate taxes
Hungary: Below 10% of corporate taxes
USA: More than 10% of shares, more than 50% shares of us-citizens
Countries with strict CFC rules, against passive enterprises
Australia: min. 5% passive income of total income
Denmark: more than 50% passive income of total income
Lithuania: Below 75% of Lithuanian taxes on passive income
Mexico: Less than 75% of Mexican taxes, more than 20% passive income
New Zealand: More than 5% passive income
Canada: Passive income, ownership of more than 10% of outstanding shares, ownership of more than 50% of voting shares
Peru: Less than 75% of Peruvian tax
Venezuela: Less than 20% corporate tax
Countries with soft CFC rules, against passive enterprises
Argentina: min. 50% passive income
Indonesia: more than 50% ownership
Poland: more than 50% passive income, less than 25% of Polish tax, more than 250.000€ revenue
Turkey: more than 25% passive income, less than 10% taxes, only for corporations
Uruguay: below 12% taxes, only for individuals
Countries without CFC rules, but general limitations
Austria: Requires significant assets for active companies
Latvia: 15% withholding tax on transactions with low-tax countries
Malta: More than 50% passive income, less than 15% taxes
Netherlands: 15% withholding tax on services in countries with less than 12.5% or blacklisted
Countries without any CFC rules
Simply all remaining countries.
To mention a few important ones:
Switzerland, Ireland, Belgium, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Luxemburg, Chile
Non-cooperating or blacklisted countries
Some countries don’t rely on the tax rate as the primary deciding factor. Instead, they simply decide by country, whether or not to apply CFC rules. They maintain lists of tax havens/blacklists. Companies from those countries automatically trigger the CFC rules and have to pay domestic corporate income tax. Many times additional limitations or the inability to deduct certain business expenses apply.
Some countries take the opposite approach and chose to use a whitelist instead. Their citizens can seamlessly own and operate a company and pay taxes at source, as long as it’s in a country on the whitelist. Often these lists include the largest trade partners. Germany, for example, tends to be a member of many whitelists.
So-called tax heavens are often being blacklisted. There is no clear definition of what constitutes a tax haven. Different countries have different standards. A zero percent corporate tax rate, in general, gets a country blacklisted automatically.
Treaties for the exchange of tax information can lead to the countries being taken off the list again. Because of that, there can be zero tax countries that are not blacklisted.
After the recent data leaks like Panama Papers and Paradise Papers, the EU now tries to sanction blacklisted countries. Up until very recently, there was no agreed upon blacklist in the EU. But in October
The different blacklists of individual member states can be found under this link.
A few exceptions to CFC rules
Exception #1: EU freedom of establishment
As a consequence of the “scandals” around offshore companies and tax-havens of the recent years, we might see a move from offshore to onshore. Even within the European Union, there are several models and strategies for tax optimization and tax reduction. All completely legal and official.
The reason is the EU “freedom of establishment”. It allows citizens of EU countries to operate companies in other member states.
Theoretically, EU law superordinates national laws and is supposed to override any national regulations that are aiming to prevent tax optimization. Exit taxes or cfc legislation are not supposed to apply. There are still countries that do not follow the EU legislation and continue to view other member states like Malte, Cyprus, Ireland, Estonia or Bulgaria as low-tax countries where the CFC rules fully apply, in case there is no local substance.
In general, the EU has been trying to close any loopholes. Most countries will therefore soon have more and stricter CFC rules. There are also discussions around unified European corporate taxes.
Exception #2: Permanent establishment with substance
CFC rules are primary trying to target the use of empty shell companies.
Things change, when a company can show credible economic activity in the country of incorporation, so-called “substance”. This means renting office space, having employees and other company assets. Given enough substance, those types of companies can be operated even from countries with strict CFC rules.
There are two aspects in which substance plays an important role. The first are double taxation agreements (DTA) (or double taxation avoidance agreements). How much substance is required exactly varies greatly between countries.
The second aspect is the EU freedom of establishment.
In cases where there is a double taxation agreement (DTA) between a high-tax and a low-tax country, companies in the low-tax jurisdiction are being recognized, given enough substance.
If there is no DTA things tend to become more complicated, but not impossible. It really depends on the countries involved.
Case studies for residents of different EU countries
Example #1: Residents of Germany
Germany is one of the most restrictive countries regarding cfc rules.
The controlled foreign company has to show a significant amount of substance. A single employee and a small office is most likely not sufficient if the company generates significant earnings.
Furthermore, the managing director has to spend a certain amount of time in the country abroad and must not have more than 50% ownership.
The company also has to contribute to the local economy and demonstrate an economic interest in establishing the company abroad. For example having local clients, which can often be difficult to acquire in a tax-haven.
If the company fails to meet those requirements, it will have to pay Germany withholding tax.f t
Even if the profits are not being distributed, they are still getting taxed in Germany.
Example #2: Residents of Austria
In Austria as of 2018 things are still quite different. Austria still has no CFC rules, just some general rules that impede tax avoidance when creating companies abroad.
Passive foreign income generally gets taxed.
However, the rules don’t impede Austrian residents from keeping their profits in the foreign company. No taxes have to paid on profits that haven’t been distributed.
You still need to justify the existence of the foreign company, for example, direct market access in a specific region. But in general, you can manage many different online businesses from Austria without a huge amount of difficulties.
As you can see the topic of CFC rules can become very complex very quickly. In general, it’s advisable to consult with an expert that is up-to-date with the legal situation and the current interpretation.
The rules are also constantly in motion.
For example, as of the writing of this article a draft has been introduced in the Austrian parliament to finally implement CFC rules there as well. And the Czech Republic introduced CFC rules in 2017.
If you need advice or legal consultation regarding the operation of a foreign company, email us at firstname.lastname@example.org, and we can put you in touch with competent and trustworthy tax lawyers.